When you fall at a bar or restaurant, the venue's first move is almost always the same: make it your fault, and if you had been drinking, make it your fault twice. Forest Park's Madison Street district is one of the busiest nightlife strips in the western suburbs, and falls there are common — wet floors during a rush, unsalted entryways in winter, dark stairwells down to a basement bar, torn mats, spilled drinks left on the floor. When a customer goes down, the establishment and its insurer reach for the customer's own conduct: you weren't watching, you'd had a few, you should have seen it. Understanding how that defense really works under Illinois law is the whole ballgame in these cases.
I am Scott DeSalvo, and for almost 30 years I have handled premises injury cases against the businesses, landlords, and property managers who let hazards hurt people. The venue having a story does not mean the venue wins. Illinois uses a comparative-fault system that is far more favorable to injured people than the bars and their insurers want you to believe. The call is free, I am available 24/7 at 312-500-4500, and you pay nothing unless I win.
The intoxication defense is the signature move in a Forest Park bar or restaurant fall, and it is used far more often than it actually holds up. The venue's theory is that you were impaired, that your own drinking caused the fall, and therefore the condition of their floor or stairs is beside the point. Sometimes there is truth in it. Very often it is a smokescreen to distract from the real problem: the floor should not have been wet, the entryway should have been salted, the stairwell should have been lit, and the hazard was theirs to fix.
The reality is that a business owes its customers a reasonably safe place, and that duty does not evaporate because a customer had a drink. A bar that serves alcohol for hours knows its patrons will be drinking — that is the entire business model — and it is precisely why the floors, stairs, and walkways need to be kept safe. Blaming the very condition the venue profits from is a convenient argument, but it is not the end of your case. It is the beginning of the fight
Here is the rule the insurers do not want you to understand: in Illinois, being partly at fault does not end your claim. Illinois uses modified comparative negligence. As long as you were not more than 50% responsible for what happened, you can still recover — your compensation is simply reduced by your percentage of fault. If a jury decided you were 20% responsible and the venue was 80% responsible, you recover 80% of your damages. Only if you cross the halfway line, at more than 50%, does your claim go away.
That single rule is why the intoxication defense is not the automatic loss the venue implies. The insurer's entire strategy is to push your share of the blame up past that 50% line, because that is the only place it wins. Countering that — showing that the hazard was the real cause, that the venue knew or should have known about it, and that your conduct was a small piece at most — is central to what I do in these cases. The floor being wet in the first place is usually where the fault really lives.
Ice cases in Illinois turn on a technical distinction that decides the whole claim: was the ice natural, or man-made? Illinois generally does not hold a property owner responsible for ice that accumulated naturally from the weather. But that is not the end of the analysis, and venues rely on people assuming it is. If the owner created the hazard — a downspout draining across a Madison Street entrance and refreezing, a plow piling snow that melts and refreezes on the walkway, a low spot in defective pavement that collects water — then you may have a strong claim for an unnatural accumulation.
Winter in Forest Park produces exactly these situations, and they are worth investigating rather than assuming there is nothing there. The line between natural and unnatural accumulation is where the insurers fight hardest, because they know most people give up at the word "ice." Proving that a drainage problem, a plowing decision, or a pavement defect caused the ice is technical work, and it is the kind of case that rewards having someone who knows how to build it.
Falls in Forest Park are not limited to the bars, even if the nightlife strip produces a lot of them. Grocery and retail stores along Roosevelt Road and Harlem Avenue have their own wet floors, spills, and cluttered aisles. Apartment buildings and their common stairways, entrances, and parking areas injure tenants and visitors when landlords ignore maintenance. Parking lots around the Blue Line terminal and the commercial strips develop potholes and broken pavement. And the older buildings that give the town its character sometimes come with stairs and thresholds that never met modern safety expectations.
Each of these has a party responsible for keeping it safe — a store, a landlord, a management company, a property owner. Identifying who had control of the hazard and who knew or should have known about it is the foundation of a premises case. Sometimes more than one party shares responsibility, which can matter a great deal to what your claim is worth.
What you do in the minutes and days after a fall has a direct effect on whether you can prove your case. If you can, report the fall to the manager or owner and ask for a written incident report. Photograph what caused the fall — the wet floor, the ice, the broken stair — and the surrounding area before anyone cleans it up or fixes it. Get the names and numbers of anyone who saw it happen. See a doctor promptly, even if you only feel sore, because the medical record ties the injury to the fall.
The most time-sensitive piece is the surveillance video. Most bars, restaurants, and stores have cameras, and that footage is often the single best proof of what happened — but it gets overwritten, sometimes within days. Businesses have no reason to preserve video that hurts them, and once it is gone, it is gone. Calling quickly is what lets me demand and preserve that footage before it disappears.
Building a strong fall case is about proving the hazard existed, that the business knew or should have known about it, and that it caused your injury. That means moving fast to secure video and incident reports, identifying every responsible party, documenting the condition, and, where needed, bringing in expert analysis on things like flooring, lighting, or an unnatural ice accumulation. Cook County premises cases from this area are handled through the Maywood courthouse, the Fourth Municipal District, and knowing that local terrain is part of doing the work well.
I also prepare these cases to be tried, which changes how the insurer negotiates. As a graduate of Gerry Spence's Trial Lawyers College and the Keenan Trial Institute, I approach every premises case ready to put it in front of a jury if the venue will not deal fairly. Businesses and their insurers settle for more when they believe the lawyer across the table is prepared to try the case — especially when their best defense is just blaming the customer.
Call me and tell me what happened at work. I'll explain exactly what you're owed, flag whether there's a second claim hiding in your case, and tell you what to do next. It's free, and you pay nothing unless I recover for you — capped at 20% by Illinois law.
I answer the phone 24/7. Call 312-500-4500.
"Scott is absolutely fantastic. He will always go the extra mile for his clients. They always take the time to return phone calls at all hours and I highly recommend him to all my friends."
-Melissa Brooks
"Great people and Scott's a great lawyer. They helped me make the wisest decision for my case, and that's important in serious legal matters. I trust him completely. He is the one to call."
-Tony Skvarenina
"Beyond satisfied with the services I received from this law firm. Definitely recommend! They got me fully paid and all the doctor bills, too. If you want the best, this is the law firm for your injury case!"
-Cynthia Rodriguez
"Scott represented me and I was really pleased with everything, my car accident paid a lot and quick. If you want a good Lawyer who is responsive, and straight with you, I highly recommend him."
-Greg Garcia
If you can, report it to the store or property manager and ask for a written incident report. Photograph what caused the fall and the area around it before anyone cleans up. Get the names of any witnesses, and see a doctor promptly even if you only feel sore. Then call me quickly, so I can preserve the surveillance video before it's gone.
Generally two years from the date of your fall against a private owner. But a fall on public or government property — a village sidewalk, a park district lot, a public building — can carry special notice rules and much shorter deadlines, sometimes about a year. Those government deadlines are easy to miss, so reach out as soon as you can.
It depends on whether the ice was natural or man-made. Illinois usually doesn't hold owners responsible for naturally accumulated ice, but if they created the hazard — refrozen plow piles, a draining downspout, or defective pavement — you may have a strong claim. It's a technical line and the one insurers fight on, so it helps to have someone who can prove an unnatural accumulation.
Not necessarily. Illinois uses modified comparative negligence, so being partly at fault doesn't end your claim unless you were more than half responsible — your recovery is just reduced by your share. Insurers always push to get you past that line, and countering it is a central part of what I do.
Nothing out of pocket. I take these on contingency — my fee comes only from what I recover for you, and if there's no recovery, you owe nothing. I also front the investigation costs, like securing camera footage and expert analysis. You never pay me to get started.
Scott DeSalvo founded DeSalvo Law to help injured people throughout Chicago and surrounding suburbs. Licensed to practice law in Illinois since 1998, IARDC #6244452, Scott has represented over 3,000 clients in personal injury, workers compensation, and accident cases.
No Fee Unless You Win | Free Consultation | 24/7 Availability Call or Text: (312) 500-4500
>>Read More
Main Office:
1000 Jorie Blvd Ste 204
Oak Brook, IL 60523
New Cases: 312-500-4500
Office: 312-895-0545
Fax: 866-629-1817
service@desalvolaw.com
Chicago and Other Suburban Offices
By Appointment Only