Wood Dale Maywood Medical Malpractice Lawyer Asks:

Maywood Medical Malpractice Lawyer

When something goes wrong inside a large teaching hospital, the responsible party is often the institution itself — not just the individual doctor. People assume a malpractice case means suing one physician for one mistake. But in a hospital town like Maywood, home to Loyola University Medical Center — a major Level 1 trauma center and teaching hospital — the reality is more layered. The care that harms a patient is frequently delivered by a system: residents and attending physicians, nurses, technicians, protocols, staffing decisions, and the way an emergency department is run. A big hospital can be legally responsible for what happens inside its walls, and understanding how that responsibility works is central to these cases.

I am Scott DeSalvo, and I take medical malpractice cases against hospitals and providers when the evidence supports them. These are among the hardest and most expensive cases in the law, which is why many firms will not touch them. I will, and I give clients a straight answer about whether they have a case. This page explains how a hospital system can be liable, what the standard of care means in an ER, and what Illinois requires before one of these cases can even be filed.

The Hospital System vs. the Individual Doctor

A hospital can be responsible for patient harm in more than one way, and knowing which applies matters. When a physician is an actual employee, the hospital is generally responsible for that doctor's negligence. But many hospital doctors — including in emergency departments — are technically independent contractors, and hospitals sometimes argue they are not liable for those physicians at all. Illinois law recognizes that patients do not know or control these arrangements; under the doctrine of apparent agency, a hospital that holds a doctor out as its own can still be responsible for that doctor's care. In a case involving a large teaching hospital, sorting out these relationships is often the first battle.

Beyond individual doctors, a hospital has its own direct duties, and their breach is its own kind of negligence. A hospital is responsible for adequate staffing, for credentialing and supervising its physicians, for its nursing care, and for having and following reasonable systems and protocols. When a bad outcome traces to understaffing, a failed handoff, an ignored warning sign, or a broken protocol rather than a single doctor's error, the institution's own conduct is on the table.

The ER Standard of Care

Emergency medicine has its own standard of care, and evaluating an ER case means understanding what that standard actually requires. The question is never whether the outcome was bad — it is whether the care fell below what a reasonably careful provider would have done under the same emergency circumstances. Emergency departments operate under real pressure: incomplete histories, many patients at once, decisions made quickly. The standard accounts for that. But it still requires competent triage, appropriate testing, recognizing dangerous conditions, and safe handoffs. When a heart attack, stroke, infection, or bleed is missed because those basic steps were skipped, the standard may have been breached.

A teaching hospital adds another layer, because much of the hands-on care comes from residents and trainees. Residents must be adequately supervised, and the hospital is responsible for ensuring they are. A serious error by an undersupervised trainee can point directly back to the institution. Understanding how a teaching hospital is structured helps identify where the care went wrong and who is answerable for it.

What Makes a Case — and What Does Not

A bad result, by itself, is not malpractice, and being honest about that is part of my job. Medicine involves risk, and even careful treatment can end badly. A viable case requires two things: that the care fell below the accepted standard, and that this failure caused the injury. Both must be true. That is a higher bar than simply being unhappy with an outcome, and it is why not every tragedy is a case — a distinction I explain to people plainly.

The only reliable way to know is to have the records reviewed by a qualified physician, and I cannot tell from your account alone. What I can do is examine what happened and, where it looks serious, have the medical records reviewed by an expert in the right field. That review is not optional in Illinois — it is a legal requirement before a malpractice case can be filed.

Illinois' Certificate of Merit Requirement

Before a medical malpractice case can be filed in Illinois, the law requires a qualified health professional to review the records and vouch that the claim has merit. This is the certificate of merit under 735 ILCS 5/2-622. A knowledgeable, licensed reviewer in the relevant specialty must examine the case and provide a written report concluding there is a reasonable and meritorious basis to proceed, which the attorney then certifies to the court. It is a gatekeeping step designed to keep baseless claims out — and it means real work and real expense must go into a case before it is ever filed.

This requirement is a large part of why these cases cost so much to bring, and why I advance those costs myself. Paying qualified experts to review records is expensive, and the case can take years. I carry that risk so that a family with a legitimate claim can pursue it, and you are never personally on the hook for those expert bills if the case does not succeed.

Why Many Lawyers Turn These Cases Away

Medical malpractice cases are expensive, slow, and hard-fought, and that is exactly why so many firms decline them. Each one needs paid medical experts, can take years to resolve, and pits you against a hospital's well-funded defense team, which fights these claims aggressively. A lot of firms are not set up to carry that kind of risk and expense, so they simply pass. That is not a comment on your case — it is a comment on how the firm is built.

I evaluate these cases seriously and take them when the evidence supports it. My trial background — including training at Gerry Spence's Trial Lawyers College and the Keenan Trial Institute — matters here, because a hospital and its insurer respond to a lawyer who is genuinely prepared to try the case. That posture is often what moves a serious claim toward a fair resolution.

Deadlines in Malpractice Cases

The filing deadlines in Illinois malpractice cases are unusually easy to miscalculate, and missing one ends the case. The general rule is two years from when you discovered — or reasonably should have discovered — that the harm came from malpractice, with a hard four-year outer limit from the date the negligence occurred. Those two limits interact in ways that trip people up, and separate rules apply to children. Because a mistake in counting can permanently bar an otherwise strong claim, the safe course is to ask a lawyer early rather than assume there is still time.

Talk With a Maywood Personal Injury Attorney

If you believe you or a family member was seriously harmed by medical care in the Maywood area, a Maywood Personal Injury Attorney can review the situation and arrange for the records to be examined by a qualified expert. The consultation is free, I advance the expert-review costs, and you owe nothing unless I win.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I find out if I really have a case?

Usually only a qualified physician reviewing the records can say for sure, and I can't tell from your account alone. A bad outcome isn't enough — the care has to have fallen below the accepted standard and caused your injury. What I can do is examine what happened and, where it looks serious, have the records reviewed by an expert, which Illinois requires before a case can even be filed.

What's the filing deadline in Illinois?

Generally two years from when you discovered the harm came from malpractice, with a hard four-year ceiling from the date it occurred and separate rules for children. Those two limits interact in ways that are easy to miscalculate, and missing either one ends the case. That's why it's worth asking a lawyer early rather than assuming there's still time.

Why do so many lawyers refuse these cases?

Because they're expensive and hard. Each needs paid medical experts, can take years, and pits you against a well-funded defense. Many firms aren't set up to carry that risk. I take these on when the evidence supports it and give you a straight answer when it doesn't.

What will it cost me?

Nothing out of pocket. I work on contingency at the standard Illinois malpractice fee of 33 1/3%, and I advance the heavy expert-review costs myself. If we don't win, you owe nothing and are never personally responsible for those expert bills.

Can I bring a claim for a relative who died from a medical error?

Yes. When a medical mistake causes a death, Illinois lets the family pursue a wrongful death claim for their loss and a survival claim for what the person endured beforehand, both through the estate's representative. These are among the most serious cases I take, and I handle them with the care such a loss demands.

<<Go To Main Page>>